www.p21.org
I am pleasantly surprised by the amount of information posted on the p21 website. It is extremely detailed and well thought-out. There is a plethora of resources available for all of the stakeholders in such a large educational platform trying to promote change. This information and data is very helpful. The website also clearly defines what they desire and show example of classroom and school models.
As I was observing their proposed content change in schools, I agreed with most of it, but I was concerned about the drastic changes they proposed. I tried access the schools in my state but I was given an error stating “I did not have permission to view the content.” This may mean it was blocked by the site or by my district. This was intriguing. Many of the suggestions proposed are slowly being integrated in my district. For example, we have just received approval for a waiver from the current state assessments. We are also seeking testing that is aligned with these ideals.
I know that the website promotes the 3Rs, but with all of the other components, I am skeptical whether or not the 3Rs would still be as prominent as they suggest. Moreover, I did not see much of a focus on actual art programs. I feel as though this is an extreme version. Most schools and districts are promoting STEM and CATE programs. I think this is safer. Just my opinion though. I am afraid that too much of a drastic change could have poor implications for students; however, their reasoning appears to be valid and well researched.
What are your thoughts? It is too extreme?
This is the kink to what I thought was bit too extreme for organizing content:
http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/1.__p21_framework_2-pager.pdf