Social Learning Theories
A news studio requires students to create original work
while working with a group of peers.
This could be as simple as co-writing a script, running a camera for the
reporter, or editing content produced by others. This collaborative learning allows students
to enhance each other’s learning.
Cooperative learning encourages an environment where students can reflect
on knowledge, process the information with their peers, and develop a common
understanding of the content (Pitler, Hubbell, & Kahn, 2012). In most studio settings this learning process
is classes Social-constructionism. Dr.
Orey defines this as students actively engaging in constructing an original
artifact while working collaboratively with others (Laureate Education Inc.,
2011).
Tips and Tricks of Cooperative Learning:
1. Vary the formation of groups. Allows students to choose some projects and
assign based on level of performance on others.
This allows students to develop knowledge and keep changing their
perspective.
2. Keep groups small. Most of my students complete packages in pairs or three person teams. In a pair I have a reporter and a photag and the role of editor is shared. In three person teams the editor is separate. These groups are determined by the complexity of the package. The production team consists of 4 people: the anchors, teleprompter, and camera operator.
2. Keep groups small. Most of my students complete packages in pairs or three person teams. In a pair I have a reporter and a photag and the role of editor is shared. In three person teams the editor is separate. These groups are determined by the complexity of the package. The production team consists of 4 people: the anchors, teleprompter, and camera operator.
3. Keep things systematic. Each role as a specific rubric and pre and
post production assignments to complete.
These are used to assess student knowledge and keep control among the
studio
.
Here is a video example of how my students work collaboratively
(created by my current Director and Lead tech) that describes the class as a
whole:
Voice Thread:
Although Voice Thread is praised by Walden University, I was
not impressed. Sure, it allows students
to gain feedback socially and therefore connect knowledge and content with
context and culture as defined by social learning (Laureate Education Inc.,
2011), but it did not have enough potential for the level of media collaboration
I would expect from my students. It would not allow me to upload a simple 45
second video. I tried multiple browsers,
formats, ect. The video format followed
the requirements according to their list.
I was not pleased. I would want
to use this source to allow students to give feedback on student work. I will stick with vimeo or youtube for this
form of collaboration. Moreover, my
students are expected to edit their audio and video with strict guidelines. They are not able to do this with voice
thread. It would be a poor use of time
to have students do such a thing when they can complete original artifacts and
post to a blog or video sharing website.
I thought about posting potential discussions or problem-based query;
however, I already do this on my website and on edmodo.com. I encourage this format for other classes
not media driven as much as mine.
Here is my Voice Thread:
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011a). Program eight: Social
learning theories [Video webcast]. Bridging
learning theory, instruction and technology. Retrieved from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E. R., & Kuhn, M. (2012). Using
technology with classroom instruction that works (2nd ed.).
Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
